A characterization of strict concordance relations⁄
نویسنده
چکیده
Based on a general framework for conjoint measurement that allows for intransitive preferences, this paper proposes a characterization of “strict concordance relations”. This characterization shows that the originality of such relations lies in their very crude way to distinguish various levels of “preference differences” on each attribute.
منابع مشابه
On the relationship between strict and non-strict outranking relations
Outranking relations such as produced by the Electre I or II or the Tactic methods are based on a concordance and non-discordance principle that leads to declaring that an alternative is “superior” to another, if the coalition of attributes supporting this proposition is “sufficiently important” (concordance condition) and if there is no attribute that “strongly rejects” it (non-discordance con...
متن کاملA consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results
Outranking relations such as produced by the Electre I or II or the Tactic methods are based on a concordance and non-discordance principle that leads to declaring that an alternative is “superior” to another, if the coalition of attributes supporting this proposition is “sufficiently important” (concordance condition) and if there is no attribute that “strongly rejects” it (non-discordance con...
متن کاملFurther results on concordance relations
The purpose of this note is to sharpen the results in Bouyssou and Pirlot (2005) giving an axiomatic characterization of concordance relations. We show how the conditions used in that paper can be weakened so as to become independent from the conditions needed to characterize a general conjoint measurement model tolerating intransitive and/or incomplete relations. This leads to a clearer charac...
متن کاملNotes on strict concordance relations
The idea of concordance is central to many MCDM techniques. It leads to comparing alternatives by pairs on the basis of a comparison in terms of importance of the coalitions of attributes favoring each element of the pair. Such a way of comparing alternatives has a definite “ordinal” flavor. It is well-know that it may lead to relations that do not possess any remarkable transitivity properties...
متن کاملAn axiomatic approach to TACTIC (juin 2006)
Most outranking methods build a preference relation between alternatives evaluated on several attributes using the concordance / non-discordance principle. This principle leads to declaring that an alternative is “superior” to another, if the coalition of attributes supporting this proposition is “sufficiently important” (concordance condition) and if there is no attribute that “strongly reject...
متن کامل